Publicerad den Lämna en kommentar

Survey strategies on national and you can state surveys was indeed made to manage students’ privacy by allowing private and voluntary involvement

Survey strategies on national and you can state surveys was indeed made to manage students’ privacy by allowing private and voluntary involvement

Local parental permission procedures was used prior to survey government. College students completed this new care about-applied survey through the one-class months and you will registered their solutions individually into a pc-scannable booklet or address piece. For each questionnaire provided the next concern to determine frequency off ever having got intercourse: “Maybe you have had sexual intercourse?” Impulse choice was in fact “yes” and you can “zero.” No definition for intercourse try considering.

Into the national YRBS, incidence quotes were determined overall by amounts (9th, 10th, 11th, otherwise twelfth), sex (person), and you will race/ethnicity (non-Latina white [white], black, or Hispanic). Into the county YRBSs, frequency prices have been computed by the grade. Statistical app was used in order to be the cause of this new complex take to patterns throughout analyses.

Logistic regression analyses were used so you’re able to account for all readily available estimates; handle to own alterations in gender, amount, and you will race/ethnicity over the years; and you will determine statistically high (p

* Alabama, Alaska, Washington, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, The latest Hampshire, New york, North carolina, Northern Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Sc, Southern Dakota, Western Virginia, and Wyoming.

Sources

  1. Heywood W, Patrick K, Smith Are, Pitts MK. Contacts anywhere between early first sexual activity and soon after sexual and you can reproductive outcomes: a scientific report about people-oriented study. Arc Intercourse Behav 2015;–69. CrossRef additional iconPubMed outside symbol
  2. Kaestle Ce, Halpern CT, Miller Wc, Ford California. Early age at first sexual activity and you may sexually transmitted attacks into the teenagers and young adults. Have always been J Epidemiol 2005;–80. CrossRef exterior iconPubMed external symbol
  3. Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, et al. Youthfulness risk decisions security-United states, 2015. MMWR Surveill Summ 2016;65(No. SS-6). PubMed additional icon
  4. Giedd JN. The fresh new electronic revolution and you will teenage mind evolution. J Adolesc Health 2012;–5. CrossRef additional iconPubMed additional symbol
  5. Office away from Adolescent Fitness. Teenager Maternity Avoidance Program. Atlanta, GA: You Department out of Health insurance and People Properties, Work environment out of Teenage Wellness; 2017. exterior icon
  6. Stark P, Noel Have always been. Manner for the senior high school dropout and you will achievement costs about United States: 1972–2012. Report no. NCES 2015–015. Arizona, DC: You Department off Degree, National Heart to possess Training Analytics; 2015. pdf icon additional symbol
  7. Brener ND, Mcmanus T, Galuska Da, Lowry Roentgen, Wechsler H. Reliability and you can validity out-of thinking-advertised height and you may lbs one of kids. J Adolesc Health 2003;–7. CrossRef external iconPubMed outside icon
  8. American Academy out-of Pediatrics. Degree away from puberty. Elk Grove Community, IL: Western Academy out of Pediatrics; 2015. outside icon

Shape step one. Fashion during the prevalence out-of previously with got sexual activity one of higher college or university children, from the degree in school and you may battle/ethnicity – federal Young people Risk Decisions Studies, All of us, 2005–2015

Brand new profile more than constitutes two line graphs indicating the styles within the frequency regarding actually which have got sexual activity among kids, by stages at school by competition/ethnicity, considering studies regarding Youthfulness Exposure Decisions Studies while in the 2005–2015.

Contour dos. Trend into the prevalence of previously with got sexual intercourse one of large college or university students, by values within condition -Youth Exposure Behavior Surveys, 29 Says, 2005–2015

The fresh profile significantly more than is actually a map of You demonstrating trends during the incidence of ever with got sexual intercourse certainly high college college students, because of the level within this condition getting 31 claims, according to research throughout the Young people Chance Behavior Surveys to possess 31 Claims through the 2005–2015.

Table. Trend inside frequency off actually ever which have had sexual activity among high school college students, by sex, race/ethnicity, and you will levels in school – Federal Youthfulness Chance Conclusion Surveys, All of us, 2005–2015

college dating app

Characteristic Frequency, % Trend p-value*
2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Linear Quadratic
Full 46.8 47.8 46.0 47.cuatro 46.8 41.2 0.0069 † 0.0770
Sex
Men 47.9 44.8 46.step one 49.dos 47.5 43.2 0.0106 † 0.1919
People 45.seven forty-five.9 forty-five.seven forty five.6 46.0 39.dos 0.0176 † 0.0648
Race/Ethnicity
Light § 43.0 43.seven 42.0 forty two.step three 43.seven 39.nine 0.3711 0.4370
Black colored § 67.6 66.5 65.dos sixty.0 sixty.six forty eight.5 0.0000 † 0.0163 †
Hispanic 51.0 52.0 44.step 1 forty eight.six forty-two.dos 42.5 0.0003 † 0.1194
9th stages 34.step 3 thirty-two.8 29.six 32.9 29.0 twenty-four.step 1 0.0000 † 0.0541
Sex
Male 39.3 38.step one 33.6 37.8 32.0 twenty seven.step three 0.0000 † 0.1789
Female 29.step 3 27.4 29.3 twenty seven.8 28.step one 20.eight 0.0080 † 0.0713
Race/Ethnicity
White § 29.4 twenty five.8 twenty-four.9 twenty seven.step three twenty-six.5 21.step 3 0.0614 0.8057
Black colored § 55.cuatro 52.5 51.5 forty-eight.2 43.1 29.cuatro 0.0000 † 0.0417 †
Hispanic 40.5 39.seven 37.9 thirty-six.8 29.six twenty five.nine 0.0001 † 0.0637
10th degree 42.8 43.8 40.nine 43.8 41.cuatro thirty-five.7 0.0449 † 0.1769
Sex
Male 41.5 forty five.six 41.9 44.5 41.1 37.9 0.1283 0.2272
Female 49.0 41.nine 39.6 43.0 41.7 33.5 0.0506 0.2927
Race/Ethnicity
White § 37.5 38.1 34.eight 38.cuatro 35.4 32.8 0.3625 0.7079
Black § 66.4 66.4 64.8 58.cuatro 62.six 47.step three 0.0002 † 0.0784
Hispanic 46.nine forty-two.step one forty-two.8 46.5 45.8 36.0 0.0095 † 0.0674
11th level 51.4 55.5 53.0 53.dos 54.step 1 49.6 0.3631 0.1934
Sex
Male 50.6 57.step 3 53.4 54.5 54.step three 51.2 0.5238 0.1321
Female 52.step one 53.six 52.5 51.9 53.nine 48.dos 0.3724 0.3940
Race/Ethnicity
White § 47.step three 52.3 forty-two.8 50.5 53.0 47.8 0.7905 0.3021
Black § 74.8 74.step 1 71.step 3 63.6 63.5 57.dos 0.0000 † 0.8166
Hispanic 55.0 58.1 56.2 56.0 56.seven 52.2 0.2288 0.2815
twelfth level 63.step one 64.six 62.3 63.step one 64.step 1 58.1 0.0811 0.2155
Sex
Male 63.8 62.8 59.6 62.6 65.cuatro 59.0 0.3548 0.9941
Female 62.cuatro 66.dos 65.0 63.6 62.8 57.dos 0.0328 † 0.0276 †
Race/Ethnicity
Light § 60.5 62.1 sixty.6 62.5 61.0 58.8 0.6164 0.3767
Black § 80.0 81.8 79.seven 73.9 77.cuatro 63.3 0.0002 † 0.1352
Hispanic 69.seven 70.5 64.seven 60.0 69.3 60.7 0.0336 † 0.5242
Lämna ett svar

Din e-postadress kommer inte publiceras. Obligatoriska fält är märkta *